Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Main Page
 Fibroids1 News
Feature Story
 Education Center

Find a Physician

Dr. Lauren Streicher  Fibroids

Dr. Lauren Streicher:
Educating Patients on their Options
About Heroes 
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
Fibroids1 Forums
Patient Stories
One Question Poll


Online Resources
Patient Brochures
Locate a Specialist
Office Visits
    Asked Questions

Video Library

Search the Body1 Network
October 01, 2020  
FIBROIDS1 NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • shot

    Nonsurgical Treatment For Uterine Fibroids

    January 08, 2013

    Source: American Roentgen Ray Society

    Women with uterine fibroids larger than 10 cm have a new nonsurgical treatment choice - hormone acting drugs followed by uterine artery embolization, a new study shows. The new treatment option can replace hysterectomy, which leaves women infertile. 

    The study, conducted at the Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul South Korea, included 40 women with 10 cm or larger uterine fibroids. Twelve of the women received gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to shrink their fibroids before undergoing uterine artery embolization, said Man Deuk Kim, MD, PhD, lead author of the study. The remaining 28 patients underwent uterine artery embolization alone. 

    There has been disagreement over offering uterine artery embolization to women with fibroids larger than 10 cm in diameter because of concerns about an increased risk of infection or sepsis, said Dr. Kim. "Our study found that by adding GnRH agonists as part of treatment, the large fibroids shrunk by about 36% on average and complications were reduced," he said. Major complications requiring hospitalization for more than 48 hours were not seen in the group that had both GnRH agonists and uterine artery embolization, while four patients from the group that were treated with uterine embolization alone suffered complications that required 48 or more hours of hospitalization, Dr. Kim noted. 

    GnRH agonist treatment does tend to make the uterine arteries smaller and more prone to temporary, sudden narrowing, said Dr. Kim. "However, our study showed adding GnRH to treatment did not prevent uterine artery embolization in patients with large fibroids," he said. 

    All patients treated with GnRH agonists and uterine artery embolization had successful procedures with follow-up of patients showing complete necrosis of the fibroids. Twelve patients treated with uterine artery embolization had successful procedures, said Dr. Kim. 

    "When patients who have large fibroids greater than 10 cm come to me seeking an alternative to surgery, I counsel them to consider GnRH agonists plus uterine artery embolization as a treatment option. Interventional radiologists may be unfamiliar with prescribing GnRH, but our study encourages them to consider GnRH as a pretreatment for patients with large fibroids who want to avoid surgery."

    Discuss in the Fibroids1 forums.

    Photo: Andres Rueda

    Last updated: 08-Jan-13


  • Add Comment
    Interact on Fibroids1

    Discuss this topic with others.
    Feature Archives

    Vitamin D May Reduce Risk Of Uterine Fibroids

    African-American Women Who Suffered Abuse During Childhood At Increased Risk For Uterine Fibroids

    Nonsurgical Treatment For Uterine Fibroids

    Genetic Risk Discovered For Uterine Fibroids

    Breakthrough In Genetics Of Fibroids

    Previous 5 Features ...

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
    Related Multimedia

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Treating and Evaluating Patients with Fibroids

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Fibroids: Who should be treated and who should not?

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Fibroids, Symptoms and Benefits of the Solution

    More Features ...
    Related Content
    Alternative to Surgery – UFE Treats Fibroids

    Fibroid Removal May Increase Success of In Vitro Fertilization

    UAE Research Continues as More Women are Treated

    The Myth of “Natural” Hormones

    UFE Today and Tomorrow – A Conversation with a Georgetown Interventional Radiologist

    More Features ...
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    © 2020 Body1 All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.