Fibroids1.com: Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Fibroids1 News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Treatments
Diagnostics

Find a Physician

Dr. Lauren Streicher  Fibroids
 Hero™

Dr. Lauren Streicher:
Educating Patients on their Options
About Heroes 
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
 Community
Fibroids1 Forums
Patient Stories
One Question Poll
    Archive

 Reference

Online Resources
Patient Brochures
Locate a Specialist
Office Visits
Frequently
    Asked Questions

Video Library

  
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
November 15, 2019  
FIBROIDS1 NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Benefits of Embolization Dependable Over Time

    Benefits of Embolization Dependable Over Time


    April 18, 2005

    By: Diana Barnes-Brown for Fibroids1

    For patients and doctors familiar with the problems of uterine fibroids, uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) has made a name for itself as the “next big thing” on the market. But some remained reluctant to try the procedure until data on longer-term success rates was available.

    Learn More
    Despite the recent popularity of UFE, many remain uncertain about what exactly interventional radiologists are. According to the SIR Web site, “Interventional radiologists are board certified physicians who specialize in minimally invasive, targeted treatments performed using imaging for guidance.” To learn more about the benefits interventional radiology offers, read:

    Recent research on interventional radiology

    Description of IR treatments for various disorders and diseases

    Recently, however, data presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiologists (SIR) has shown that UFE has a five-year success rate of roughly 75 percent, adding to excitement about the new wonder treatment and increasing skeptics’ confidence.

    The idea behind UFE is a simple one: Fibroids – noncancerous tumors in the uterus, uterine wall, or appending from the uterus – require a large supply of blood to flourish, so if the supply is cut off, the fibroids die. How to achieve this goal, however, was a challenge that women’s health experts struggled with for many years.

    Enter UFE, a procedure that involves the injection of tiny plastic particles into the artery that feeds, so that they can flow to smaller circulatory pathways and block the blood supply from within, all without cutting into the uterus or surrounding structures. The procedure is minimally invasive, relatively pain-free, and sends patients home the same day with few after-effects.

    To supporters, UFE was just short of a miracle cure for fibroids, a disorder that only 10 years before was thought to be best cured by hysterectomy – surgery to completely remove the uterus, associated with a long, painful recovery as well as irreversible effects for fertility, hormonal balances within the body, and other serious drawbacks. (Fibroids are still the cause of an estimated 200,000 hysterectomies annually.) Still, some doctors and patients felt the need for more caution pending proof of long-term success.

    The recent study, led by James B. Spies M.D., a professor of Interventional Radiology at Georgetown University Medical Center, followed 200 patients who had undergone UFE, and found that of the 182 patients who completed the five-year follow-up period, 73 percent remained symptom-free, while 20 percent had “either failed or recurred with new fibroids,” according to the study. Among the group of patients who failed to respond to the treatment or experienced a recurrence of symptoms or fibroids, there were 25 hysterectomies (four of which were not fibroid-related), six myomectomies, and three “repeat embolizations.”

    “Some gynecologists have been waiting for long-term data before being comfortable recommending the UFE procedure, and now that we have that data, I think patients will be hearing more about UFE as a non-surgical option,” noted Spies. “The results are comparable to myomectomy, a procedure in which the fibroids are surgically removed, but UFE is less invasive, and women recover from it more quickly.” The next step, he added, is to research and compare rates of failure and success with patient demographics, to help doctors determine which treatment is best for which patients.

    Last updated: 18-Apr-05

    Comments

  • Add Comment
  •    
    Interact on Fibroids1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    Uterine Fibroids: If in Doubt Always Ask for a Second Opinion

    With Flip of Wrist, Interventional Radiologists Treat Uterine Fibroids

    Fibroids Have Significant Impact on Workplace Performance

    Uterine fibroids have greater impact in African American women

    Should Women with Fibroids have a Hysterectomy?

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
    Related Multimedia

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Treating and Evaluating Patients with Fibroids

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Fibroids: Who should be treated and who should not?

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. - Fibroids, Symptoms and Benefits of the Solution

    More Features ...
     
    Related Content
    An Untapped Partnership: Interventional Radiologists and Gynecologists

    Hershey Doctors Partner to Empower Women with Uterine Fibroids

    Uterine Fibroid Embolization – What to Expect

    Managing Short-Term Pain Associated with UFE

    Patient’s Praise for Uterine Fibroid Embolization

    More Features ...
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    © 2019 Body1 All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.